Oodles used in a sentence

Oodles in a sentence as a noun

Those concerned with privacy have oodles of crypto-tools to do so with. It's just people can't be bothered.

But whoever actually solves this problem will make oodles of money.

There are tens of thousands of developers wasting oodles of man-hours frustrated with this. It's bad for Ruby and bad for Rails.

Yes, they all have oodles of 1-star reviews from upset buyers, but they did get approved somehow. It seems like I just got unlucky with reviewers.

Maybe that answers your question, people don't want to pay Apple oodles of money? > Frankly, I think its appalling that youtube, for instance, is still running on flash.

But they're still consistently profitable as it is, and they have oodles of cash. They've languished somewhat over the years, and grown a bit fat and lazy.

The main advantages of Xeon were dual-socket support and support for oodles of RAM slots, and the new Mac Pro supports neither of these things.

I'm not against high pay for executives or that kind of thing, so I'm fine with him making oodles of money if he's doing a good job. Part of doing a good job in that position, though, is not sticking one's foot in one's mouth.

Hydrogen brings absolute oodles of troubles with it. For upper stages, where it is much more critical to minimise the wet weight, that trouble is generally worthwhile.

A strongly worded opinion, arrogant or not, has demonstrably saved months of work and oodles of money for clients down the line. > starting sentences with "actually, I think" or "No, that's wrong&;&."

Especially not for a foreigner with no connections and without oodles of money to spend on the issue. By comparison, it's far easier for people to get involved in politics in the US if they want to work at it.

There are oodles of business models that could make use of this today. Right now, the only one that's really been tried is "day gambling cruise" - sail out of a port where gambling is illegal, gamble once outside the relevant imaginary lines, sail back into port.

I've been doing this stuff professional for around 20 years now, and I've worked with oodles of female programmers over the years, and I've never seen any reason to believe that female programmers are in any way less competent than their male counterparts. None.

Have done stuff on Yahoo's Hadoop setup as well, these used high end multicore machines provisioned with oodles of RAM. If I were to be generous, Hadoop ran 4 times slower as measured by wall clock times. Not only that, Hadoop required about 4 times more memory for similar sized jobs.

Although by accident, since I hadn't played RR before inventing RT. RoboRally is vastly more complex and has oodles more depth. Robot Turtles is entirely pictorial and great for ages 3+.

> building out just about every library you could want It's unlikely that an open source language is both "secret", and has oodles of libraries - things just don't tend to work that way. Here's a simple anecdote: Erlang doesn't seem to have a good image manipulation library/interface to Graphics/ImageMagick.

Sites that don't charge are floating on investor money, and investor money would really like to get oodles of money back eventually, instead of slowly growing a modest business that comfortably supports one or two people. I don't have the link anymore, but there's an excellent essay that says exactly this using a metaphor about strip mining versus farming.

If you ask people, it's a benefit that actually really matters - it saves people oodles of money, is better quality than what most people can pull off by themselves at home, and people seem to genuinely put it up there as a major reason to stick around.

It's all very well sitting back in our cities with power and relatively good pay and oodles of free time, philosophising to ourselves and declaring that god could not possible exist, but for people in packed, impoverished slums, religions serves as a motivator, either by being the only thing that gives people hope, or principally because one is taught it at a young age and doesn't have the time or education to question it with science or reason. This has nothing to do with a "lack of intelligence".

Nor do I have oodles of experience with either Rust or Go. However, as I see it, the problem with our current language ecosystem isn't "we lack a safe, fast, low-level language in which to implement things"; as you've pointed out, we've long had Ada. Instead, the problem is "people are using C++ to laboriously construct applications that, while not safety-critical, still require a high degree of reliability". This is a social problem rather than a technical one, and it probably has more to do with path dependence and resistance to unfamiliarity than with the technical merits of the modern iterations of either language.