antecedents

I believe the pool's antecedents and ideas are much more diverse than that.

Damn, that sentence is gnarly for verb/noun phrase antecedents taggers.

You've got too many pronouns without antecedents in your post.

Theorems, obviously, are more like libraries because you can simply plug in the antecedents and get out the sequents without looking at the proof.

And if the natural antecedents are forgotten or fade away then all that is left is unexplained event that seems supernatural.

The 4004 is not the ancestor of the 8008; it was a completely different processor family with different antecedents.

It's no different than any significant technology that has few antecedents.

People whose antecedents came from the jungle were primitive, Hitler said with a shrug; their physiques were stronger than those of civilized whites and hence should be excluded from future games.

McCarthy acknowledged IPL V and recursive function theory, but the elegant and practical face he put upon these antecedents was a work of genius.

But Everything is a Remix argues that ownership of ideas has always been problematic, because it's never been possible to cleanly separate an idea from its antecedents.

It seems baffling to consider this from a political/macroeconomic perspective; how would you increase demand but through marketing activity, without your methods becoming coercive or oppressive?> If the necessity of demand isn't the elephant in the room, then why isn't there broad political support for higher tax rates on the wealthy?Because the two concepts have nothing to do with each other, and support for higher taxes on the wealthy - or anyone else - has antecedents in much more basic underlying principles that many do not share, and often strongly oppose in their own right.> Why isn't there broad political support for economic stimulus packages?