Form used in a sentence

Form in a sentence as a noun

MtGox should not refund this in any way shape or form.

The symbol it interned when the form was read.

Perhaps, but only in a very weakened form.

I went through about five digital form contracts, and when I got to the last one, it had the clause in there.

I hope the FAQ information below helps hackers achieve their dreams.

My former boss was furious, the HR person was furious.

Doing that is simply robbing your long-term platform value for short-term successes.

There's actually a formal name for this phenomenon.

Facebook -- that is, the stock service they offer with walls and friends and such -- is the killer app for the Facebook Platform.

At first I thought this was posted by one of the email's recipients as a form of revenge on its douchebag author.

Are you telling me high school history and civics left you with the propensity to be a more informed voter?

I mentioned before, but if you want guaranteed replication, use w=2 form of getLastError.> But, the real problem:> 1.

"I've seen this enough to be sick of it; it seems to be form of the software "everything is just an [easy] problem" mindset gone badly wrong.

But for the most part they just have a bunch of crappy tools that read and write state machine information into relational databases.

It now 404's so I've posted it here:Stevey's Google Platforms RantI was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long.

The two are basically the same thing, because platforms solve accessibility.

" The general form of the problem seems to be a blindness to the depths of domain knowledge required to be effective in other disciplines.

We don't do internal service-oriented platforms, and we just as equally don't do external ones.

Form in a sentence as a verb

It implies that you can stream fragments of Lisp programs as small as a single form over sockets, and have them be compiled and evaluated as they arrive.

One day, I was sent some ******** email that I needed to do about 100 audits including "ghost employee audit" and check a box on a web form that all were complete.

Maestro's funding is a feeble thing compared to the gargantuan Microsoft Office programming platform: it's a fluffy rabbit versus a T-Rex.

But they understand platforms as a purely accidental outgrowth of having started life in the business of providing platforms.

The tech community might get its act together, give up all social causes and form some kind of committee or group to push for such amendments, but I seriously doubt it.

If we really cared about benchmark performance over anything else we would have dealt with the locking issues earlier so multi-threaded benchmarks would be better.

We can't keep launching products and pretending we'll turn them into magical beautiful extensible platforms later.

They've made some fundamentally non-open choices, particularly around their mobile platform.

Would you?Well, the first big thing Bezos realized is that the infrastructure they'd built for selling and shipping books and sundry could be transformed an excellent repurposable computing platform.

From the time Bezos issued his edict through the time I left, Amazon had transformed culturally into a company that thinks about everything in a services-first fashion.

It implies that you can define a macro and immediately have the compiler incorporate it in the compilation of the next form, or evaluate some small section of an otherwise broken file.

But that does not mean a private party should be able to indiscriminately sue anyone around who happens to be offering services that involve some form of money handling, or their investors, for the results of the existing system.

People can and ought to be able to unite to form great companies without having to compare notes on how they voted in the last election or some similar matter having nothing whatever to do with whether someone can add value to the venture.

And this is the major factor not grasped by those today who assume that society is evolving to a point that, if only right-thinking people with good motives are given enough power over our lives, they will somehow magically transform society for the good through government action.

But assaults on privacy are but a symptom of a deeper malady as modern society increasingly believes that it can hand over massive forms of unchecked government to its politicians in the naive belief that such power can be used wisely if only we have right-thinking leaders at the helm.

If I am doing a desktop search for local files, it is not be expectation that that search will be transmitted to servers without my consent, and that it does so makes it spyware even if we don't also take into consideration that it is being done to track my interests for monetary gain in the form of referral links.

Why, when these leaders are allowed to lord it over us as they see fit, should they suddenly develop scruples in gathering information that only serves to enhance their power to do what we are already letting them do without so much as a peep of principled opposition?Privacy is in significant peril, and it is a serious loss when Groklaw goes down over this issue.