spouting

People have a right to free speech and that means spouting nonsense to further their goals.

It's disrespectful and speaks volumes about the person spouting off and nothing about who he's going off on.

At the very least, try to understand how CAN works before spouting nonsense grounded in uninformed assumption.

Before you go spouting off untruths you know zero about, go read the respective companies 10-Ks, moron.

This guy is a tourist spouting off about his low-energy hotel while sitting in the first class cabin of a 747.

What positive outcome could possibly be had by still spouting bitterness and negativity against him?

Most proponents of AGW are also frothing at the mouth and spouting exaggerated, incorrect crap.

Any valid points they have are drowned out by hundreds of non-scientific people frothing at the mouth and spouting exaggerated, incorrect crap.

Does any of them remember the ways in which it went bad and never took off, or are they just spouting hype?

If you stand up on a table in the cafeteria and start spouting hate speech, you can and will be escorted out by security.

You might check your facts before spouting this kind of sentences.

I wish I could lol, but the thought of this guy getting paid for spouting this nonsense really chafes my hide.

Are people still spouting "dotcom crash v2.0" nonsense?

> Are people still spouting "dotcom crash v2.0" nonsense?

And you responded that there's "hundreds of non-scientific people frothing at the mouth and spouting exaggerated, incorrect crap." And saying I claimed there's a massive cover up conspiracy, when I said no such thing.

But statements like this are why I think you're spouting crap: "is actually trivially done (and has been used by countless projects for years) in almost all imperative languages, and less intrusively" Is simply not true.

Spouting a bunch of stereotypes about the local immigrant population is a pretty fucking ignorant view of that history.

Spouting random facts doesn't constitute a rebuttal.