shit-stirring

This stuff typically doesn't reach paper outside of the Guardian unless the Daily Mail are in a shit-stirring mood.

It's mostly far-right shit-stirring because it's a much broader set of crimes than you are being led to believe.

And, of course, exaggerating (or entirely fabricating) the supposed shit-talk they reported to you is another level of shit-stirring.

It’s not going to have taxpayer funding, oversight and no far-reaching powers over other official departments besides shit-stirring and distraction.

You can also engage in that broader topic without defending obvious shit-stirring specific examples/figures, like Musk.

I had the same problem to varying degrees with other parts of this article, which (with only minimal pejorative intent) I'd describe as mostly shit-stirring.

But it really doesn't matter what this specific president says, because he's a senile, lying, prevaricating, shit-stirring lunatic.

They might be doing something bad, but this is shit-stirring, and nothing more.

Years of behind-their-backs shit-stirring lies by a couple members of the group finally got figured out and called out, publicly, which lit the fuse.

Secondly, it's a bit of good old shit-stirring.

> I had the same problem to varying degrees with other parts of this article, which (with only minimal pejorative intent) I'd describe as mostly shit-stirring.

I realized that the entire section is irrelevant to someone seeking information about the movie and at its worst, an opinion piece or cleverly disguised political shit-stirring.

One man's "anti-corruption blogger" is another man's the "US-funded shit-stirring puppet".

"As far as you can tell" is just your misinformed and shit-stirring opinion.

That these shit-stirring "journalists" are praised and said to have some sort of talent by their respective circles for knowing how to "shake things up," and their higher-ups want nothing more but for them to continue.

I see the headline's now been changed to "RAF base in Cyprus hit by drone strike" The Telegraph is, of course, strongly anti-EU, so the original headline might well have been a form of shit-stirring - "look how weak the EU are being by not retaliating!", or something along those lines.