inherence

What you describe is certainly one authentication method (inherence, aka what you are or do).

Biometric factors are also known as inherence factors (something you inherently are), which means you can replace biometric factors with inherence factors like geofencing (your location on this planet is something inherent only to you).

This is probably partially due to increasing urbanization and higher life expectancy (alive grandfathers = no inherence).

Also, he gave away 90% of his wealth _while he was living_ so not relevant to this discussion about inherence.

Secondly - the supposed inherence of values that support capitalism is completely false.

Hence the inherence and need for significant effory to override instinct.

A big one is that if you're using inherence and virtual methods (out of fashion though they are) then you'll almost certainly need a pointer.

I was just becoming aware of prototypal inherence and it was so confusing because search results mostly pointing to the prototype library.

You can't do that in Scala, because of type inherence.

This data is part of the inherence class of factors in multifactor authentication, and can even be derived from pooled anonymized data by a motivated party.

Factors are: Knowledge (password), Inherence (biometrics) & Possession (device).

Although when comes to programming there is still different styles, compositions over inherence, condition verbalization, etc… I wonder if that makes the difference.

My phone is very keen to use the word "inherence", which I didn't even know was a word.

Standard MFA stuff (from wikipedia) "knowledge (something only the user knows), possession (something only the user has), and inherence (something only the user is)" I'll end with another opinion...

[Ok some researches say "biometrics" is something else not just "something you have" it is inherence -- something you "are".