scooters

Traditionally bicycles, which was followed by motorbikes in South and Southeast Asia and electric scooters in China.

No mention of electric bicycles or more powerful two wheeled vehicles such as the 70 million petrol scooters in Vietnam.

If you've seen cities that had major increases in cycling and/or electric bikes/scooters, you were probably surprised by the success.

However, basically everyone prefers the excellent electric scooters to these because they are much faster.

I live on the Venice Beach boardwalk and have been increasingly seeing people zip around on these scooters.

That statement is in response to fears that as people move up from scooters/motorcycles to this car, the emissions problem would get worse.

The only reason anyone buys scooters, either electric or gas, in America is they can usually be operated without a license and insurance.

I meant to say that bike riders emit much less CO2 than both cars and scooters.

If you want a hobby device to rant against, try scooters, those things are much more deadly and rightly deserve to be taxed and regulated.

Where I live, college kids flying around on their scooters/motorcycles in residential areas are dangerous.

They can afford scooters, which cost one quarter that much.

In most of the big cities, electric scooters dominate.

You may recognise these as just "scooters" in your own country or "mopeds".

"In terms of overall pollutants, it has a lower pollution level than two-wheelers being manufactured in India today." In Southeast Asia today there are currently 100 million motorcycles and scooters powered by two-stroke engines.

> Scooters emit less CO2 per distance traveled than cars (and obviously much less than bike riders!) I don't have time to dig up the numbers right now, but I think your "obvious" claim is probably quite badly mistaken.

Scooters are much more viable in the dense cities of Europe and Asia.