scholasticism

I mean, why would Luther of all people have a problem with one of most important figures of Catholic scholasticism.

If you like a lively treatment of dead scholasticism of the mind-vs-brain problem then you can do no better.

The lecture-tutorial pedagogical model used in universities is called scholasticism and dates back to the middle ages.

This isn't even philosophy - it's a digital remix of medieval scholasticism pretending to be philosophy.

This is common across many institutions throughout history, such as with scholasticism and the Catholic Church.

The decline of scholasticism is honestly one of the single worst things in our age and responsible for most modern grifting.

It's rebranded medieval scholasticism with already-known scientific theory taking the place of Vatican dogma.

Historically, Scholasticism was a big part of the background against which the 18th-century empiricists were rebelling, so from my perspective they're almost opposites.

What aspects of Christian scholasticism do you think developed into modern science?

The author mentions 'flipped learning': this is the modern equivalent of scholasticism.

This is all proper Science (TM), not mediaeval scholasticism.

The medicine in question comes from the very scientific establishment that grew out of scholasticism, which is why I find the accusation of anti-intellectualism rather strange.

Well, to be fair "thought deeply" might mean "engaged in a scholasticism-tier effort of apologetics to argue a position it held to be true a priori"...

What you're doing, with this whole "let's make a bullshit word logical" is more similar to medieval scholasticism, which was a vain attempt at verbal precision.

Augustine is from late antiquity but I think should "count" as medieval because it was so influential to scholasticism, and is similarly great/relatable.

You wrote: > What you're doing, with this whole "let's make a bullshit word logical" is more similar to medieval scholasticism, which was a vain attempt at verbal precision.

Scholasticism went out of favor in part because proving things based on the assumption that Aristotle or the Bible is correct does not help once you question the source.

Scholasticism is also exclusively Western, but philosophy was and is as important in the Christian East as the West.

Scholasticism was intellectually very rigorous and supplied the philosophical foundations for the modern sciences.