pluralist

Therefore, for a pluralist society to survive, it must be intolerant of one thing- intolerance.

To me as a language pluralist, none of this particularly sounds like anything new.

I'm neither a liberal nor a pluralist, so I totally feel comfortable calling this abberent and cultish.

Nobody has scaled this up to a large pluralist math library like Mathlib.

We can hold different opinions in a pluralist society and still get along.

Okay, here’s the first step: install a pluralist democracy via a representative democracy.

If they had succeeded in turning Russia into a pluralist liberal democracy, that would have been better for millions of Russians and everyone else.

Does morality explain zoning laws, or is it more about the equilibrium point of a pluralist conflict, everyone looking out for their interests, etc.

Terrorists (as well as their supporters) are intolerant and non-pluralist.

Yes that is normal thing to do in pluralist democracies.

Coastal trade based states will tend to go pluralist.

I am a pluralist (a person who accepts that he must live with people he doesn’t necessarily like) not because I want to be, but because the alternative is constant rage and war.

"The difference is that with communism, there is also one ruling party that brooks no opposition and no pluralist civil society," she said.

I'd at least like to know who defines who is a "Pluralist" and who is a "Terrorist".

If "diversity and inclusion" were part of the pluralist fabric of liberal tolerance shared by the vast majority of people this issue wouldn't arise -- since then there could be a great actual diversity of opinon whilst values were shared.

You claim Israel needs to “become democratic” and is an “apartheid” state despite the fact Israel is a functioning pluralist democracy that comprises both Jews and Arabs (unlike Gaza, which expelled Jews and is led by terrorists).