philosopher

Being a philosopher is not an extraordinary designation, such that it puts them beyond the mental abilities of someone of Elon's obvious mental aptitude.

Each of these philosophers cites a previous philosopher and has transformed our thinking of political economy in some way.

It's why some people in these parts are angry that Ayn Rand has never been considered a serious philosopher.

How interesting would it be to (ultimately) talk to a gorilla or octopus philosopher?

A philosopher would be the first to understand that no one is or can be excluded from the realm of ideas or thought.

Y'all are philosophising too much about the copula (a rather common philosopher's pasttime).

I'm not honestly a good enough philosopher to be clear on how I feel about the origins of mathematics.

Is there a difference between the sort of logic that a mathematician would need to know and the kind that would be appropriate for a philosopher?

> Bostrom is a philosopher That is my main concern about people writing about the future in general.

But then that's precisely the point: Bostrom is a philosopher.

I'm not a big philosopher, but I enjoy that much more than science.

Elon Musk is an engineer, not a philosopher, and I stand to be persuaded, but I find using him to counter Michio Kaku ridiculous.

White than from an academic philosopher." Best of luck!

In the words of philosopher Thomas Nagel: " If sub specie aeternitatis there is no reason to believe that anything matters, then that does not matter either ".

Libertarianism's philosopher's are the unpopular clowns at the children's birthday party of society hoping that bending their "business innovation's" into balloon animals will convince the starving attendees to actually enjoy watching them eat all of the cake.

This is quite the change from the typical wannabe philosopher blogs "durr web is broken." or "10 Things To Know When Making Web App in <yyyymmdd>"...ok back to reading the rest of the posts!