pharmaceutics

At least that's how it tends to work in the pharmaceutics industry.

The same thing could be said about pharmaceutics, but lo, the FDA now exists for a reason.

Like pharmaceutics that add a vitamin to an existing drug and get a whole new patent for it.

That's called paying conferences and travels to the doctors that will prescribe the pharmaceutics.

In other fields, like pharmaceutics, where future patents can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars, authors are very careful what they tell others.

Still convinced that pharmaceutics corporations guided only by their shareholders hunger are our best way to go to take care of medical research?

They are an important tool for many areas of science, not just physics but chemistry, biology and pharmaceutics to name a few. Whether there's any "new physics" left to discover there I guess depends on your point of view, but there's still plenty to learn about how matter works.

By contrast, the areas that are heavily patented, such as telecoms and pharmaceutics, resist change, are run by cartels, and extort consumers with grossly inflated prices."

Should pharmaceutics hold all the clinical trials results for 100 years and only sell black box medicine pills? To be clear, I think that more transparency is good, and the lack of publication of unsuccessful studies is a problem because it causes a strong bias in metastudies and border cases.

Patent law is very suitable for processes that cost millions to develop, but in pharmaceutics the big cost factor isn't process development, it is the discovery. What Myriad did is identify the gene, that is where the cost was sunk that they somehow have to recover.

It's pretty hilarious physics and I was said also practically important in pharmaceutics and cosmetics industry.

Medelpharm designs and sells machines and software used worldwide to study and optimize tableting process mainly in pharmaceutics. Mission: Teammate with the project owner, you are autonomous to design and develop full-stack features using Clojure, Clojurescript and React.

It literally cost billions to make any innovation in silicon, pharmaceutics, automotive etc. > That's nothing about copy-catting though.

No, seriously, somebody please figure a pharmaceutics delivery business model that does not depend on FDA for legality & operations.

Lots of neurophysiological research for instance has nothing to do with pharmaceutics at all, and is purely done to figure out how brains work. Moreover experiments done both with macaques and humans show there are relatively lots of brain areas that do the same task, which is exactly one of the reasons it actually makes sense using macaques for such research."

This is the tech equivalent of the following fallacious kneejerk reasoning you see in anti-vaxxers: "big pharmaceutics/Monsanto is evil, therefore since big pharma also makes vaccines, any new vaccines that comes out is bad because they just want your money." This kind of knee-jerk conspiracy theory stuff doesn't help public health and isn't linked to any specific claim.

Compare this "easier to ask for forgiveness than permission" style to the public utility lost by performing rigorous governmental approval and costly testing of the likes that pharmaceutics pass through before market entry.

The funding for subsidies is currently collected mostly from the middle class, as taxes, and then it rushes through the hands of farmers or other subsidized entities right into the pockets of "intellectual property" owners for agri tech, pharmaceutics, arts, music. Where it disappears from the system, if wealth is not taxed, or otherwise redistributed back into the circle of life, so to speak.

The same could be argued to ensure that absolutely any key competency remains in Europe - nuclear reactor design, pharmaceutics design, car design, aircraft design, trains design, or whatever; but none of it should justify the creation of EU projects in any of these fields.

The point I'm trying to make is that the reason why the effectiveness of many treatments decreased and now we have a decline in life expectancy it's a very complex issue and it's not fair to see it as simple as a fact failure of pharmaceutics or/and medicine. Regarding your last statement, I think that we are not seeing improvements because our modern environment and life style has changed and is changing in such a rapid and unpredictable way that medicine can keep the pace. Medicine it's improving, but it's improving too slow. It is as out environment and lifestyle is traveling by plane while medicine and pharmaceutics are traveling by bus...

Even in pharmaceutics, confounding variables are already common place that led to a considerable replication crisis, with human behavior it would be even more impossible to control for every variable, and measure only what one wants to measure. A very simple problem with such a design which would perhaps indicate that human beings that are not allowed to be kind would be less happy is simply that human beings become unhappy when they are told what to do, not necessarily anything related to kindness; it's certainly not implausible.