perceiving

The human eye isn't actually perceiving S[i], it's perceiving some convolution of it S[i] \conv w[i] (for a window function w).

It's why this part of the article is wrong: > Humans are also terrible at perceiving velocity at a constant speed.

Is my brain just perceiving that the text on the car is bright yellow, while the actual color in the image is much darker?

Or is your harsh tone due to perceiving this small change as inadequate for an outdoors guru like yourself?

Physical reflexes and adrenaline responses operate in different ways when someone is perceiving real operations rather than an obvious simulation.

The object cannot be said to have inherent existence apart from the mind perceiving it.

Further, even if perceived, that perception itself is potentially only incrementally more representative of true understanding than not perceiving it at all.

I wonder if we are perceiving an acceleration on the rate of improvement for open source OSs.

So meta discussion aside, there is a difference between 'seeing' and 'perceiving' and one of my great uncles who was blind was much better at perceiving what was going on around him than sighted people.

But about the final result of perceiving this orchestra - why am I in my brain and not anyone else's?

Extinctionists want to do it by removing those capable of perceiving suffering.

The player starts perceiving more of the effect their playing has on the sound, and with the added detail the sounds 'comes to life'.

So "time" would just be our way of perceiving a static causal relationship between atoms, in the same way that "color" is our way of perceiving wavelengths of light.

Earbuds can do that; the audio "sounds" low to you, but you're only perceiving the delta between the device volume and environment noise.

Intuitive and perceiving say "right brain" or non-linear thinking to me.

> "perceiving the differences may be difficult on real-world sites" Geee, I wonder why?