pecker

I’m really glad I learned how to touch type, despite being quite a quick hunt and pecker. So yes, it can be done.

But I am at a vantage point that pecker hunters never visit. 4.

'How much wood could a woodpecker chuck if a wood pecker could chuck wood ?' At my senior level I rarely spend more that 20 minutes before confirmation of a phone screen or a rejection

This was an evaluation of a theory that woodpeckers had an energy dissipating section of bone that protected their brain. That would make for a safer brain, but a worse pecker.

Around twenty years ago my dearly departed father had a multi-year war with an acorn woodpecker. The little pecker liked to hide its nuts under my dad's roof shingles.

There are too many other items that fall under the umbrella of productivity that being an average "hunt and pecker" won't do one much harm.

The hunter-and-pecker has to think about typing! This consumes attention and short-term memory that is sorely needed for thinking about the program itself.

> what actually gets approved is longer lasting pecker perkers and yet another blood pressure medication That's a problem with the industry and the government, not so much with the research. But I'd love to see improvements there.

My typing speed was in the 70+ WPM on qwerty prior to learning dvorak, and now I'm a glorified hunt-and-pecker on qwerty keyboards. The only exception to this is typing on my mobile device, which is configured to qwerty.

Tiny pecker syndrome. But let's stop and remember that Rockefeller and Carnegie, the OG capitalist titans, were dick measuring by donating their money.

Obviously everyone is different and taste matters, but unless you're a 2-finger hunt-and-pecker, I all but guarantee that you'll find you like some keyboards much more than others.

I am also curious what your thoughts are, if you’re a hunt-and-pecker, of how much that does or does not affect your productivity? I have this ongoing argument with my kids because they want to hunt-and-peck with one or two fingers per hand and to me that’s like swimming with one arm when you have another arm and two whole legs to use.

They specifically wrote that they believe that a “touch-typer” is a more effective programmer than an untrained “hunt-and-pecker.” I wrote that I am a “hunt-and-pecker,” and that I believe that I am quite effective.

I am proposing that dress and behavior can influence how men treat a woman and if you are a woman who is serious about having a career, you should take some responsibility for your half of it and not just bitch about how all men are led around by their pecker and there is nothing a woman can do about it. I did work for a Fortune 500 company for over 5 years.

It's possible eventually the grey market importation of unlicensed generics would make profits too small to justify the risk, and Novartis might decide yet another pecker perker would be a better investment than a cancer drug.

To extend the message I usually advocate giving to religionists: Just as you keep your pecker in your pants and out of my wife, you should keep your sexual mores in your bedroom and out of mine; your faith in your church and out of society as a whole; and [new addition] your ideas about marriage among yourselves and out of everyone else's language. Who the fuck do those nutjobs think they "are,* to decide what everyone else understands as "marriage"?