orgasmic

Taking E and smoking a whole pack of cigarettes while sitting in front of the bass box at a nightclub is so fun it's almost orgasmic.

And when the media starts getting orgasmic about something its only natural that bloggers are want to follow.

While designing circuits and solving mathematical equations is quite orgasmic, it has its down sides too.

Dopamine responds to novelty and anticipation, and is elevated to near orgasmic levels during sexual excitement.

Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgasmic future that year by year recedes before us.

It seems orgasmic for them, like something the hardest drugs couldn't fulfill them.

Also, what would be really orgasmic is if it would be possible to type math in Latex inside the browser and see it displayed nicely like that.

Or.js - to make Silicon Valley go orgasmic?

I do commits every time I'm done implementing a feature, and it's so damn satisfying -- almost orgasmic after nagging my co-workers for years.

So, if we were to imagine having thunderously orgasmic AND fruitful conversations, then it may involve Dropping Goal-directed Belief/Conviction pairs and Adopting ADgoal-directed ADbelief/ADconviction pairs.

Face it, some programmers out there go practically orgasmic when they get accepted or even interviewed by some companies that they end all critical thinking and sign on the dotted line.

> Those that become enlightened on the path of confuzzlement reach the orgasmic state of eternally confuzzled where people marvel at your ability to cause a stunned silence like with the mere utterance of a few simple words.

What's a cheap flight and a room within this budget near X area?" and if it could also go and make a booking through your accounts it would be orgasmic.

The marketing language ("ecstatic," "orgasmic," "dopamine hit") explicitly invites a consumerist mindset.

"Orgiastic future" - Fitzgerald simply assumed the word "orgiastic" existed, as a more clinical word for "orgasmic".

Not that I'd expect anything less from a site titled "Cult of Mac" How is the reader expected to take this as even remotely objective commentary, as opposed to the quasi-orgasmic fanboy text-spasm that it surely is?