neil

But, this isn’t a new argument, Neil Postman devoted an entire book to it 30 years ago [2].

It's not just Cory Doctrow vouching for him, but also Charlie Stross and Neil Gaiman.

Seriously, Neil Young is 69 and has played feedback-drenched noise for the past forty years.

Does anyone believe Neil Young, an aging rocker, can actually hear the difference?

I'm not suggesting that we go back and edit Neil Armstrong's words--they were of their time and are amazing.

This is such a bad analogy (I think you got it from Neil Tyson or something).

The gulf between Neil Young and anyting resembling consensual reality seems vast.

Hope Neil Young will remember, streamers don't need him around anyhow.

Or by the numerous other critics of advertising: Adam Curtis, Jerry Mander, Neil Postman, etc.

And of course, Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death and Technopoly.

I've mentioned Jerry Mander's Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, which deals heavily with advertising, and Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves to Death.

> It's not just Cory Doctrow vouching for him, but also Charlie Stross and Neil Gaiman.

If you're a procrastinator, "The Now Habit" by Neil Fiore might also be of value to you.

> The "book internet" still exists Amanda Palmer recently wrote this about her and Neil Gaiman: neil and i, and many other bloggers, have discussed this with more and more worry lately.

Neil Young does not understand mathematics based on the Fourier Transform, especially sampling theory.

Neil Young has been trying to sell an 'audiophile' grade audio player.

Neil's player reduces distortion signal A by a tiny fraction.