merck

Anyhow, the impact is real such as with Merck and Gardasil.

If GSK has a perpetual treatment Merck has every incentive to release a cure to cut them out.

It is fully dominated by the mega-corps that can afford to buy political influence, from Pfizer to Merck to Gilead.

I believe the logical place would be in the location it was first synthesized by the Merck company: Darmdstadt in Germany.

I don't want to pay taxes for Merck to make a billion dollar drug.

Canadian one sold Ebola vaccine license for $200K to some no name US lab, that same lab turned around and resold it to Merck for $50mil.

Then there's the fact that AbbVie and Merck are coming into the market soon with their own Hepatitis C drugs that also have 90% cure rates.

I can read the Merck Manual and other secondary and primary sources etc.

AbbVie and Merck are big pharma companies.

And yes, we'll have to see what Abbvie and Merck do.

Well, it's not a terrible idea, but the FDA did not approve Gardasil for patients older than 26 because Merck was unable to document any actual reduction in cancers.

> Then there's the fact that AbbVie and Merck are coming into the market soon with their own Hepatitis C drugs that also have 90% cure rates.

Merck's shop to buy "Merck's gout elixir" (I use that example because the Merck corporation actually does trace its origins to a late 17th century apothecary).

>> In the summer of 2011, Merck president Julie Gerberding said in a news interview1 that she's "very bullish on vaccines," as she recounted the various ways she helps Merck sell its products.

Even after the large 2014 outbreak, Merck claims that they do not view the development of the vaccine as "a commercial opportunity", but rather as being good for PR and for employee retention.

Do a dig of heartbeat.belkin.com and you get a bunch of 54.0.0.0/8 addresses that Amazon bought from Merck.

Merck bought it only because it is standing to make few billion off of it.

Merck & Bayer have done exponentially more work than that - and they invented it.