landmass

The language is relatively simple, the culture is welcoming, the landmass is beautiful and there are not so many crowded cities / places.

A canal system wouldn't work for the USA but for a smaller landmass like England it could work.

Texas as roughly 5x the size of NC by landmass, and has approximately 3x the number of road miles.

We are the second largest country (by landmass) in the world, yet our population is slightly smaller than California.

Cause, I mean, sure its no problem for the landmass or the state.

We pay for that through increased rates due to covering such a huge landmass, most of which is sparsely populated.

Canada + Mexico + the US occupy something like 95% of the landmass alone.

Or we just remain a landmass where recording others is allowed in some places but not other places?

So you have all this landmass but only a tiny bit is usable.

Since America is like 25% larger in landmass and has more people in some of its larger states than the entire population of Australia.

The landmass based empires I study with interest have typically lasted more than twice that.

Likewise, the small population and small landmass doesn't reduce the threat.

> With 80 percent of its densely populated landmass lying near sea level, Bangladesh is often hailed as "ground zero" for climate change.