interviewee

Easily the best part of this article is that the interviewee is called Councillor Wood.

A good answer to this question from the interviewer's perspective is a genuine weakness coupled with examples of specific actions the interviewee is taking to overcome this weakness.

It also gives the added benefit of allowing the interviewee to interact with everybody as a group.

Its good in theory, but it leaves a lot of ambiguity for the interviewee to parse through.

But this wasn't the standard AMA format, wherein an interviewee reads questions off the screen and types in answers directly.

Especially if the interviewee can tell you why it's a bad idea, or what the gotchas are with using 'delete this;'.

That way, the interviewee gets the opportunity to essentially interview the company too.

The interviewee (the vowel count makes me dizzy) can choose what he/she prefers.

The problem is exacerbated when the interviewee is not impressed when the latest, bleeding edge tech is in use at the target company, and has seen similar projects completed with stable and boring tech.

There are so many formats and mediums - if you allow the interviewee to guess what you are expecting they will most likely guess wrong.

That's a perfectly good question for an interviewee to ask.

If you're interested, our interviewee this week is M.

I think this says it all: "Interviewee: Yes, that was actually an.htaccess thing I forgot to do.

Per the article, most interviewers interpret "cultural fit" as "personal fit" - how well do you like the interviewee?

Interviewee* And as someone who is about to graduate computer science, your rant makes me hopeful:) I am much better at refactoring and finding patterns than memorizing algorithms and other things (mainly because they are relatively easy to look up).