hyper-advanced

The story of insignificant humans who ultimately are controlled by eternal, hyper-advanced species, seems a repeated theme.

Not only are they hyper-advanced AI, but they've broken physics and escaped the current universe.

Maybe others are doing some hyper-advanced stuff where the edging out makes a difference, but I just don't buy it.

It was basically a hyper-advanced games console with a keyboard.

My primary LLM use case is as a hyper-advanced search.

But why do people always use the fate of resource-constrained preindustrial societies (both Europe and America) to try to predict relationships between hyper-advanced Kardashev-level civilizations anyway?

That's why we need to think really, really hard about how to make the information survive in a way that is still digestable to a hyper-advanced civilization.

Your head keeps inventing reasons why is it real and the voices keep explaining it - in some cases it's religious experiences, in my case it's hyper-advanced technology enabling telepathic communication.

If we had hyper-advanced ovens from The Jetsons where we could type a prompt using a fold-out keyboard and it would magically generate whatever cake we ask of it: did we or did we not bake that cake?

I could always try and use a hyper-advanced Scala implementation or application in the future given I can make choices at one point and then have to revisit said choices in the future given the changes brought by new developments.

But I also can't help but imagine a hyper-advanced alien species thinking the same thing about us due to us lacking some notionally critical (to them) aspect of intelligence/consciousness and paving over the solar system to make room for a hyperspace bypass.

> in a way that is still digestable to a hyper-advanced civilization I don't think hyper-advanced civilization would have a problem with this - they would either have not lost the knowledge or be able to figure out the danger themselves by using their hyper-advanced sensors and stuff.