digestable

If you look at finviz you can see what I mean about more digestable information.

Product Search is just another form of summarization/snippeting that just presents the data in more digestable format.

How do you explain these issues in a simple, digestable format that takes a minute or less to read?

If you're willing/able to chop the work into tiny digestable chunks then Odesk.com or Elance.com might be a good fit.

It is a large amount of data, but it's not curated in a very digestable format.

He's super passionate about locks and gives a ton of easily digestable information about them.

RMS has an extreme stance, but it's actually quite refreshing that he just puts it out there in an easily digestable form.

We do it by sending digestable data and using the right language on reports.

It has green or red marks where it lists information indicating if things are good or bad that is a bit more digestable.

Numpy based neural networks are a lot more digestable as far as understanding all of the moving parts due to the easy syntax.

It ends with: > But the most important lesson -- and the most easily digestable -- never confuse technical difficulty for demonstrated value.

But I use the word hard-fought intentionally: this is know-how that is not easily digestable from a blog post.

One of its core problems is that it kept the name "gamergate" for a lot of similar-but-unrelated issues which makes it encompass a lot more than is humanly digestable by anyone looking it up for the first time.

But there isn't any metaphysic here that re-inforces the divide between mind and body — it is a philosophy of how we feel about the supposed bifurcation of reality (into easily digestable categories like "the physical" and "the mental").

So I wrote Digestable, an ingredient and food additive database.