hydrocarbon

There is no sign in stock markets that all those hydrocarbons will be left into the ground.

Oh--you can't have airplanes unless you have hydrocarbon fuels.

My position is that liquid hydrocarbon fuel is always going to have a specialist niche.

The characteristics of liquid hydrocarbon fuel are pretty good in most ways, which is why we still use them.

There are hydrocarbon engines which have been fired thousands of times between rebuilds, for hundreds of hours of firing time.

All combustion does - that is the end product of essentially all of the 'carbon' in 'hydrocarbon'.

You seem to be assuming zero capital costs for fusion plants and hydrocarbon synth capacity.

Turns out you can use chemical bonds for storage in other compounds as well, including simple hydrocarbon chains forming either gases or liquids.

The biggest expense in making solar cells is energy - that exact same hydrocarbon energy who's price increase is being celebrated.

Huge resources have been put into improving batteries and while they have improved it's not been enough to get near the energy density of hydrocarbons.

Until SpaceX came along and developed its own hydrocarbon engines, we were reduced to buying hydrocarbon engines from the Russians.

So if you take, say, natural gas, which is the most prevalent hydrocarbon source fuel, if you burn that in a modern General Electric natural gas turbine, you'll get about 60 percent efficiency.

"I fully agree with the premise that there will continued widespread use of fossil hydrocarbon fuels for electricity generation, transportation, and building heating.

It might be a shoal of hydrocarbon herrings, or some Saturnian Kraken being woken from its long sleep by the alien emanations of the spacecraft overhead, although I can't see any reasonable prior that would give such propositions greater plausibility than the more geologically-oriented suggestions in the article.