huffpo

And, in fact, if CNN and huffpo decided to say all priests are pedophiles, they would be spreading a lie.

HuffPo wasn't turning a profit for AOL in 2013, and Tim Armstrong wouldn't say in Dec.

Gotta love how BI has synthesized both HuffPo and BuzzFeed for the tech news channel.

Imagine the liberal loons (or worse) getting airtime on CNN and huffpo and making it sound like all priests are pedophiles.

In any case, HuffPo's revenue is largely driven by rehashing the original reporting of other outlets, and that is definitely not sustainable journalism.

Not so AOL, Adsonar, Huffpo and all the properties in their network.

HuffPo makes more in revenue p.a than what AOL paid for it.

Don't skip it because it's HuffPo, skip it because it's Johann Hari.

In fact, from your HuffPo link: >The complaint does not allege that the government of Israel or anyone acting on its behalf violated U.

I think what he's saying is that the founder(s) of HuffPo aren't torture apologist(s), so your comparison doesn't really carry weight.

HuffPo's coverage of the riots has been abhorrent at best.

Certainly, but in this case, I don't think HuffPo was targeting software developers...

From the HuffPo article: "To give some context as to how truly extreme this is, a comparison may be useful.

But I don't think "Look at this piece of trash that HuffPo posted" would be particularly great HN content, either.

I long ago filed HuffPo under "clickbait" along with similar entities, like the Daily Mail.

What we get with Richard Bernstein's article, one might hazard, is a "demonstrably misleading depiction" of the New York Times article from a motivated industry apologist that plugs its own anecdotes and loose figures into a narrative that seems to have its own populist agenda: the New York Times is not much better than HuffPo or Fox News when it comes to real journalism.

Huffpo does that,but the other way around,just to make you click on the article again.