guzzler

Only in Virginia & China and other coal-intensive regions is an electric car more polluting than a gas-guzzler.

They have to spend $20 or $30 driving their gas guzzler to/fro the bar that's booked them for the night.

It's only sold in California, it's a 3rd party drivetrain and battery bolted onto the frame for a gas guzzler SUV.

Similarly, if a flavor profile only appears to exist in certain more expensive wines, one guzzler may appreciate looking for its subtleties.

You'd have to extend the life of the gas guzzler for quite a while before there's a net increase in pollution vs.

Is there some sort of crazy game of one-upmanship in the USA as to who can drive the most impractical gas guzzler?

Man, that's the best pitch I've ever heard to buy a nice sexy gas guzzler with great engine/exhaust noise.

Ferrari is allowed to tell you how to turn it into a gas guzzler, they just can't sell it to you as such.

Every tree-hugger and gas-guzzler I know wants cleaner air, cleaner water, and not to kill polar bears.

You might have also done the math on how much of your surplus value you, as developer, are pouring into the sales guys' gas guzzler...

Compare that with an old gas guzzler from the 70s running at 25% efficiency with maybe an 85% efficient transmission for 20% efficiency at the wheels.

I don't want a gas guzzler so I'm waiting around for the electrics.

I suspect they'll still have some sort of "not a gas guzzler or CO2 producer" subsidy, though it'd likely be very mild.

If you ever spoke to them about it, they would give you something along the lines of "I am an earth-saving pedestrian, you are an environment-killing driver of a gas guzzler- ergo I always have the right of way.

"However, a few times a year I drive my car on longer trips (Portland, Reno, LA) so I would probably need wait for Tesla's supercharger/battery replacement network to expand before I can get rid of my gas guzzler." If it is only a few times a year, why not just rent a car?