gonads

Yet the studios have Netflix by the gonads since the studios control who gets to see what when.

Kings can and do discreetly satisfy their gonads without having to go through difficult public divorces.

Your gonads produce variations of genetic material based on their own blueprints (which come from you parents, not your genes).

There's a bunch of easily found stuff on animal experiments where it shrinks gonads and brains.

And it would be discriminatory to give the job to the women purely based on her gonads in such a scenario.

It's likely that there were more advantages to any male with dangling gonads over retracted.

As an embryo, your gonads start in your chest and, through signals from your brain, end up in your pelvic region.

So depending on the overall state of gonads in our civilization I'm worthless now - but if we didn't need gonads, my mind would suddenly start having a value?

Admitting the less qualified because of their ethnic groups or gonads is simply antithetical to the entire project of civilization and progress.

This likely wasn't a problem when we were semi-erect (in the evolutionary sense, not the other sense) and had hairy gonads, however why did modern humans develop wholly unprotected gonads?

You could even cut off things like Ronald's gonads for a special treat.

We should give them to people because of their upbringing or gonads?

And no, it really is not interesting to see regurgitated back the standard TV line that "it was all to do with his gonads".

By “goads” do you mean “gods” (in, like, the Battlestar Galactica sense) or is that supposed to be “gonads”, as in junk?

I've personally witnessed several of them immediately mention "gonads" when first hearing the term "monad".

"gonads" would be my choice of name for this library.

Gonads and skin color are correlated with a diversity of perspectives.

You can't say strife without mentioning Gonads...