goldiblox

In the recent GoldiBlox suing the Beastie Boys which resulted in a swift counter-suit, the settlement to drop the lawsuits included a public statement by GoldiBlox.

That statement accounted to an admission of guilt and explained that GoldiBlox was in the wrong.

For a real-world, tech/music battle that showed how true this distinction is, research GoldiBlox vs.

If you recall, GoldiBlox retained a big-time Silicon Valley IP firm when they filed suit against the Beastie Boys claiming Fair Use.

What I Would Do: Find out what law firm represented the Beastie Boys when they went after GoldiBlox.

Beastie Boys are 2 for 2 in defending their sync rights in the past 5 years or so (GoldiBlox & Monster Energy).

First it was GoldiBlox, then it was Warhol, and now it's this one.

When it became obvious the Beastie Boys 1) Were going to fight, and 2) The Beastie Boys were going to win, GoldiBlox fired them and hired different counsel.

There is a difference, and Goldiblox vs.

I feel that this will be much less of a problem for our children given the advent of toys like Goldiblox and even Lego sets aimed for girls.

Today's better lesson: LibraPay is too cheap to fork over money for effective legit marketing, so they're going the GoldiBlox route and trying to pick a fight to make themselves look good and get press.

Not to immediately jump into your assertion as correct in this instance, I do recall such an element being used as an initial defense by GoldiBlox after they sued the Beastie Boys.

This, Goldiblox, and Blurred Lines are all headline cases where the defense was, in short, "you'll ruin art if this one case is found against the popular artist!" and that's it.

Granted, I did really, really like how GoldiBlox had to wear a proverbial dunce cap by putting a statement on their website to the effect of "We were wrong, way wrong, shouldn't have done that, and don't make the same mistake we did." Pretty epic.