findings

The findings of classical mechanics have also been verified multiple times, before being contradicted by the findings of relativistic physics.

Does that mean these findings should hold true for iOS as well?

You will have access to senior engineers/architects and your findings/ideas will be heard by senior decision makers.

The level of detail here is great and really sums up 10 years of a lot of hard-earned findings.

At an abstract level, epistemology is no freer from the findings of statistics and empirical psychology of reasoning than philosophy of mind is free from the findings of neuroscience and psychology.

He started with a theory and then did a shallow search to bolster his pre-conceived theory, ignoring or discounting any findings that didn't fit.

I’m slightly skeptical about the multiple regression at the end, but the rest of the findings are straight-forward to interpret.

I love the extended abstract at the top that includes the principle findings and conclusion.

Merging these arguments together with Bouchard & Mezard's in public discussion would erroneously conflate all these arguments and weaken the impact of Bouchard & Mezard's findings.

Did your findings change the ferocity with which you drink?

[edit] Reading the conclusion in one thesis, their findings were the colors did more harm than good.

Michio Aoyama’s initial findings were more startling than most.

> Industry body, the UK Cards Association, dismissed the findings saying Which’s report was “not a new story”.

"these findings won’t dictate how we choose to invest" What is the value of performing an analysis if the results don't help you to improve future decision making?

Anyhow, I'll quote an excerpt from one of the comments: > A married man is considered (in the sociology findings) to bring "more than" one person to work with him, because it is assumed he has someoone feeding/dressing/cruise directing him.

Findings didn't change that much, but the break itself changed the way I drink, I think.