fighters

It's pretty obviously understood what comparable male fighters would do to women fighters like Bethe Correia.

Saying it more plainly, just because men are naturally stronger than women, doesn't mean that men are naturally better fighters.

Also all fighters know how to defend an armbar, RNC, triangle etc yet they still tap to them.

Pound for pound, top male fighters are going to be between 50% and 100% stronger than Ronda.

So steroids for fighters aren't commonly associated with weight issues (they do outside of fighting, for hormone treatments or bodybuilders).

Curiously enough, young female fighters are as a rule completely oblivious to this, until the day they get hit in sparring.

But to me, the most impressive thing was how well female fighters technique is now.

Of course depending on where you get your news from rebels could be named 'terrorists' or 'freedom fighters' and what not.

It's why there's even a discussion to be had about her beating male fighters her size - her specialty around armbars.

The 50% - 100% is based on top male fighters at the same weight levels.

The plots in the post make no distinction between male and female MMA fighters.

Yes, top, even middle of the road, male MMA fighters would destroy her.

In boxing, there are fighters who never achieve "greatness", or see much success, but are regarded as having heart.

In many of his later fights, he would "play around" and toy with fighters.

"Top male fighters are wary of facing her." First of all, that's false.

How we went from arguing about "Top male fighters are wary of facing her." to "Beating the best male fighter at ~135" I don't know.