extenuating

But even so, technology is fallible in extenuating circumstances, and human intervention will always be needed as a recourse.

This was either in a very high-security zone, or there was some other extenuating circumstance.

Regardless, absent of some extenuating factor related to performance, no way should you have been given no notice and no severance.

There's an argument for a limitation on this right based on extreme or extenuating circumstances...

What you've written isn't true unless there's some extenuating circumstances you're not disclosing.

That said, be careful, because there are extenuating circumstances.

It is personally very rewarding but also incredible extenuating.

As I understand it, from the perspective of an insurance company, rear-ending is basically always your fault no matter what the extenuating circumstances are.

Also -- and this is wild -- it could be the best behavior given the circumstances and our OP just isn't aware of all of the extenuating circumstances.

Furthermore, there is the concept of extenuating circumstances.

> But even so, technology is fallible in extenuating circumstances, and human intervention will always be needed as a recourse.

Absent a strong financial incentive (in this case a much better trade in value) or other extenuating circumstance, I would always buy directly from Apple.

The "extenuating" (if you could call it that) factor was that the monitoring software was written in house and it was just shit.

Rather than say "injures no one - regardless of the extenuating circumstances", you could say "injures no one - through sheer dumb luck".

(There's a saying in trading that losses are "tuition fees") Were there extenuating circumstances?

So of course people were outraged by that sort of thing and now the pendulum has swung to the "life means life" and there is little to no consideration of prior record, behavior while incarcerated, or possible other extenuating circumstances.