distorts

Government spending distorts the market towards 'things that are good for citizens' and away from 'things that are good for the owning class', you mean.

It really distorts the job market to have people tied to a particular position at a particular company.

The general squeamishness of media on these issues completely distorts the real-world statistics of murder versus domestic violence and rape.

So, any public support for wage earners distorts the market by driving wages downward.

By removing a Government policy which distorts markets, we move back to a system where businesses are primarily equity-funded.

Maybe they've finally made javascript so fast that it distorts time itself.

It seems like at least Philosophy 101 should be mandatory to quantum physicists.) Reality doesn't depend on an observer (who distorts it by his observation).

And its very existence distorts the market, such that looser conforming loan requirement increase housing prices across the board, and stricter requirements decrease those prices.

The only areas that Mercator distorts significantly are polar regions.

It would be insane in a place where discrimination based on gender/age/race hadn't been a thing for so long that it substantially distorts all aspects of society.

Having to pass through peer review potentially distorts things.

And sure the cash is often helpful in growing though the growing quickly may well not really be good for the business when it distorts the companies focus to making huge financial bets to get huge returns.

That "socialised" health care distorts US spending to the diseases of old age.

I find it interesting that when the government distorts a market via pricing controls, taxes, or other means, the law of unintended consequences almost inevitably kicks in and it's result is either "bad luck" or calls to "fill in the loopholes!" Distort the market and people are rational-enough agents and will change their behavior, just not necessarily entirely in the way you hope/want.