directions

You're assuming that the government is as good at choosing research directions, choosing which entities to bring to trial, and running the trials as private industry.

The paradox says that an universe infinite in space and time would have to be bright in all directions.

It's trivial to wire things up in both directions by having them listen to each other.

Those who know where they are going don't need to stop and ask for directions.

You do need to also sample light going in other directions, since the sun isn't the only light source (other objects reflect).

Money tends to push things in directions that only benefit the ones with money.

With still other traits, the average values for the two sexes differ by smaller amounts and in different directions for different traits.

You could have a problem with one eye, like serious shortsightedness, or clouded, or muscular problems that point your eyes in different directions.

Its cool our energy problems are being solved in two directions at once.

I actually wouldn't mind the cooking part, I like following directions and making stuff, even Ikea furniture, it's fun.

If a meal kit has good quality parts and clear directions (complex is fine) I'd be up for that.

That force people concentrate on actions and look for directions or goals.

PPK is doing the equivalent of saying "let's stop and ask for directions [on our car journey]" and you're saying "no, let's just keep driving I'm sure we'll get to where we want to go".

It's one thing to look at the benefits and the consequences and say, "OK, I'm willing to trade information on my position in exchange for realtime updated traffic flows and generally perfect maps and directions and nearby points of interest." I totally get that.

> PPK is doing the equivalent of saying "let's stop and ask for directions [on our car journey]" and you're saying "no, let's just keep driving I'm sure we'll get to where we want to go".