deistic

The term is frequently, but not always, capitalized in vaguer deistic references to a single deity as well.

The crew is faced with a deistic and perhaps apocalyptic super hero on their crew.

Of course if one takes a deistic point of view you end up with the exact same issue.

Basically, what ever you want to say about this deistic god, how it came to be etc.

Some sort of deistic civic faith that is less about faith than it is about ritual, philosophy, and social relationships.

People who want to believe in deistic god will not receive any objection from me.

On the other hand, as I have already said in my previous post, positing a deistic god i.e.

No one can in principle provide proof there is no deistic god, nor can anyone provide a proof that such a thing exists.

What about a hypothesis of a deistic God makes it no longer needed?

As far as a deistic god, you clearly don’t believe in that, as any reference to divinely given scriptures runs counter that concept.

All the above paragraph is saying is we don't need the hypothesis of deistic god ether.

> the blind faith in the 'forces of the market' is another politically deistic stance It's really humanist.

Unless you want to call the physical universe "god", which is on itself a valid deistic proposition.

>Unless you want to call the physical universe "god", which is on itself a valid deistic proposition.

This whole argument is shortened into "deistic god can neither be proved nor disproved, but we no longer need him to kick off the universe for us.

The American system is predicated on the universalist idea that, "people here are free to have both kinds of beliefs, theistic AND deistic," and the trend I was pointing out is religion is becoming a reactionary tendency.

Deistic or Theistic, if someone doesn't suck at religion I think that they should be left alone.