datum

Even the professionals seldom know anything for sure, and sources and means of gathering information are usually more important than any individual datum.

And the ongoing practice of helping themselves to quite a bit more datum than even their terms of service warn.

In other words, big data usually precedes big revenue, but most data products are priced per datum not per revenue.

You can always add another column with a unique index, if someone lies to you that any particular datum is unique.

A neater solution would be to, as the botanists identify species, fill in a number of key datum for them, e.g.

You can invalidate a valid immutable datum; you can only wait until it is expired.

The only thing is that a lot of people like to extrapolate their one datum, and that should still be called out.

An individual result is a datum and not automatically a bullshit anecdote.

Not an individual datum, but the stream itself.

I recall lodash author saying that if you want HOF, Datum order to change you can `rearg` the whole library to suit your needs.

In fact it is impossible to distinguish between data and metadata in general, so you can always come up with examples where a particular datum's role is ambiguous.

Actually, I think this might be a great opportunity to separate applications/datum that don't need to be indexed by search engines from those that do.

You're almost certainly referring to the now-infamous "trick", roughly related to tree ring datum.

Insert questionable math based on single point of data 35% sales, from single source, for a narrow datum "books available both in print and on Kindle.

But perhaps the most striking datum was what Vaillant wryly called a "value-free definition of health": Those who had the poorest ratings were six times as likely, at age 47, to be dead." I think the premise that this is a problem for the rich is a bit off though.

> Repeat after me: The plural of Anecdote is not 'Data' Right, 'Data' is the plural of 'Datum' and I provided you with two of them.