criticisms

Most important thing: your criticisms are valid for all the problems of supervised machine learning.

Fascism contains criticisms of capitalism alongside praise for the most aggressive market competition.

If you have an issue with the information in the articles, then please put forth some criticisms rather than weak appeals to authority.

Do you have specific criticisms of my work and/or attention to detail re: the TLS specification, and/or my library's application of modular arithmetic et al?

I, personally, agree with many of these criticisms, so I don't consider Tolstoy the best teacher and inspirer of that matter.

Then why not stop including insults with your technical criticisms?

Although many of the criticisms in the article are individually valid, many of them are divorced from context, eg not considering the facts of state politics.

I probably agree with half of these criticisms, but they are all pretty minor.

Wasn't that one of his criticisms of someone else's code?

I know this because of the way you respond to criticisms of your work.

If we avoided reading books simply because they have criticisms, we'd never read anything.

We'd love to hear your feedback, thoughts, and criticisms!

Those criticisms are true but they completely miss the reason why non-programmers find Excel compelling: the UI starts with a visual grid of the "output".

Dismissing such criticisms with "It works for me," "If you don't like it, don't use it," or "Who cares about X?

Some criticisms of Mozilla are fair (even if blown out of proportion, like the Pocket issue), but one can not expect a project to make development even more complex by adding a "revert it because this one guy doesn't like it" button for each change or feature.