Valid used in a sentence

Valid in a sentence as an adjective

I love Khan's work and what he's doing, but at the same time the article raises some valid points.

I lost my Adsense account two years ago, due to valid violations.

The 'security theater' points that many of you make are valid.

" their response is usually along the lines of "No, because [valid reasons]".

Some companies do the validation study, and use IQ-like tests in hiring.

I think this is a completely valid criticism, and it's one I largely expected.

There is only one valid definition of a business purpose:\n to create a customer.\n\nNo.

The one valid definition of a business purpose is this: A business should do what the owners want it to do.

However, if pitot tubes are frozen and the computer no longer has valid airspeed, the pilots no longer have valid airspeed either.

The jury is basically told that the patent is presumed valid unless they can clearly find compelling evidence to invalidate.

The process for mixing a password into an ECC key exchange involves a trial-and-error process for finding a valid curve point; a loop runs conducting these trials.

The patent bar is in an uproar that issued patents might not be deemed presumptively valid when challenged but might be much more vulnerable to challenge going forward, and so too are the trolls.

A passive attacker could, in an earlier version of the Dragonfly protocol, discern how many iterations through the loop had happened to find a valid point given a password.

Is there something about being a musician or artist that disallows one from having a valid intellectual opinion taken for its own sake, without being patronized?

Microsoft argues that the Federal Circuit has skewed patent litigation by arbitrarily making it more difficult to invalidate patents than Congress had intended.

A company defending a brain-teaser test for hiring would have to defend it by showing it is supported by a validation study demonstrating that the test is related to successful performance on the job.

That made me think of a way to evaluate the hiring procedure mentioned in this blog post--do empirical validation of whether people hired through that procedure really do better work over the course of their career than people hired through other procedures.

The reason it is not a particularly exciting case from a headline standpoint is that it deals with what appears to be a specialist technical issue of patent law, that is, what is the proper "standard of proof" to be applied when a patent is challenged as being invalid?

Language extension usually works this way: a previously unambiguously wrong statement is made valid; but JS semicolon insertion often turns "wrong" statements into "correct" statements, so it leaves less "entropy" to be taken advantage of when increasing the power of the syntax.