chaebol

There are more and more anti-chaebol laws (they can't make soap and jeopardize small and medium makers).

Samsung (and other Chaebol corporations) has a different relationship to the Korean nation than Google has with the US.

Then that person can build a challenger to the chaebol - one fueled by fresh thinking and real inspiration.

Why should the chaebol, who monopolise industry talent, be required to do the same in other industries?

The influence of chaebol [1] on the Korean economy and politics is a contentious topic, often split along ideological lines.

For more details on this, there's some really interesting documentaries on how the Chaebol system works.

Must be nice being a chaebol and having the complete backing of your government.

But he's not the chaebol, he's just a tool for people walking away unscathed to try again at a more opportune time.

Why not hire an incredibly well educated local, who'd be just as happy to not take a job in a boring chaebol grinder?

This reminds me of South Korea's chaebol and Japan's keiretsu business groups.

For those who don’t know the term ‘chaebol’: They’re South Korean business conglomerates, controlled by a chairman who has power over all the operations.

In Korea it's called Chaebol - LG, Daewoo are other examples.

Samsung is a “chaebol” – one of the family-run conglomerates that dominate South Korean society.

It's probably worth noting that Korea "chaebol" (conglomerates) can be a little odd.

Counterpoint, Japan also forwent building arms and instead built infrastructure and "robots and ai" and have their chaebol counterparts in keiretsu yet their internet infrastructure lags.

It also doesn't hurt that it seems more socially acceptable to seek employment outside of salarymanship to Chaebol.

Chaebol are a whole 'nother level of diversified.