anglo-saxon

The country is not reliant on the US for a political identity for for economic ideas - indeed France has long rejected the conventional wisdom of 'Anglo-Saxon capitalism'.

This is a reaction to the centuries-old stigma against Anglo-Saxon derived words as being crude or inelegant.

Just a heads-up that the concept that the creditors must accept risk is a very anglo-saxon perspective.

One cause is America has deep Anglo-Saxon and European roots hence the majority of the population is/was White; the opposite issue may be present in Africa, India, or China where 'whites' are minorities.

If you join British Empire and American hegemony together, get 400 years of expanding Anglo-Saxon culture with internal power shifts (like different dynasties in China).

White Anglo-Saxon Protestants are not the inventors of names nor does it seem like that group in particular is radically defensive of how naming works.

Teams can reject candidates for other reasons besides the He's-Not-White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant-22-year-old angle.

I would suggest at a minimum, it reflects the Anglo-Saxon legal mindset, and at a maximum, it reflects the human legal mindset.

Far behind those three would be being mixed race, but mostly caucasian (I got enough Anglo-Saxon genes to dominate the South American genes).

>Just a heads-up that the concept that the creditors must accept risk is a very anglo-saxon perspective.

Values prized in Anglo-Saxon economy is freedom and individualism.

In the other direction, I never understood rap until I studied Anglo-Saxon poetry.

He likely means "foreign" in a more classical sense: Orwell tends to favor Anglo-Saxon derived words over Norman French-derived words.

As someone with a more classic understanding of terrorism, it is both amazing and chilling seeing the social pathogen injected on 9/11 coursing through the "Anglo-Saxon" west.

Be wary of those studies that only use "Anglo-Saxon American College Kids" as test subjects, which is a group of people that isn't even representative of America in general.

On the other hand, he really is an excellent historian of ideas and of early modern science; maybe a little less empirically grounded than historians from the "Anglo-Saxon" world like me might prefer, but you can't deny the usefulness of his ideas.

I'll try to describe my point of view as detailed as I can - you shall know I'm not an Anglo-saxon, but a Pole.