accuser

The full report doesn't corroborate ideological causes here; the closest is over-caution at disturbing the accuser and stopping to investigate wherever she asked.

There's only a second wrong if the accuser is just outright lying.

Lack of evidence or credible track record by the accuser makes this indistinguishable from concern trolling.

The only thing that accuser has to certify is that they own a copyrighted work.

Even when it’s a matter of personal safety, Facebook will not reveal the accuser.

Taking them seriously means investigating them, it means not blaming or shaming the accuser, and fixing the serious flaws in how our legal system manages to do the aforementioned things.

That's how the legal system works in many other situations, the accuser has to prove their accusations, which is perfectly reasonable to me.

The law is designed to make the job of respondent harder than the job of accuser, since they are the one accused they should obviously have to take steps to prove their innocence </s>.

And if the accused was publicly called out to defend himself, more facts may have come to light that affirm or contradict the accuser.

What is most likely to happen in cases of harassment is making the accuser happy, since that provides the company with the most protection.

Although I think her being labelled as a feminist false accuser is as much the reason as her being a woman.

Is assume it's not a move to further discredit their accuser.

And there can be no accusations about "those people" receiving basic income, and the accuser not.

When your first response to a claim of harassment is "let's consider the bias of the accuser", it casts doubt on the legitimacy of the claim.

It does not define what process will be used to address CoC violations, being ejected from an OS project for violating the CoC can be a serious thing with personal and professional ramifications but an accused is not given the right to face their accuser nor the right to an impartial jury (which would be hard to do anyway since the accusation could be something like "he's making me anxious") 3.

It is often flawed, but is at least designed with the goal of fair and consistent treatment for both the accused and the accuser." So if it fails while having had good intentions, there's nothing more to be done?