verifiable

For applications that need data that is publicity verifiable, such as the weather or sports outcomes, it could work, but if the information is not is publicity verifiable, e.g.

Torture is very effective when you are certain the subject actually knows the target information and the information is easily verifiable.

The problem is that DNT isn't verifiable DNT should be done in browser and in the original website by not loading the tracking scripts at all.

Can anyone even point to open, independently verifiable evidence that shows that torture yields good human intelligence?

Another related tactic is for people who have a long track record of promoting false information promote something that's verifiable.

If not, then how can you expect to get a foot in the door with no easily verifiable proof of competency?

It makes me sad that people hesitate to discuss verifiable facts for fear that small-minded people might call them nasty names.

I don't understand why there are so many downvotes on something that is, indeed, a verifiable statistical fact.

We have much stronger guarantees available that are verifiable and terribly difficult to impersonate.

Basically exactly the same idea as verifiable release binaries for things like Tor.

There's a difference when you can't be certain the subject knows the information you want – or if that information isn't easily verifiable.

Note, even one verifiable leak would create a gigantic shit storm, probably knocking billions off of Google's market cap, not including lawsuits and fines.

Contra repeated claims that this piece was transformed by addition of "opinions", it seems to be composed entirely of verifiable facts.

The only real thing the "already successful" people have is a bunch of smoke and mirrors that honestly doesn't have verifiable value that they use to bullshit clients.

Torture is by definition neither open (you're not going to tell the public "Oh we just tortured X") nor idependently verifiable (for this multiple entities would need to torture the same person for the same information), so this kind of evidence would be really hard to obtain.