Vaccinate used in a sentence

Vaccinate in a sentence as a verb

When I was a kid, they used the exact same injectors to vaccinate us in school. That was in mid-80s.

Buy a kid a $10 flu shot, vaccinate him for a year. Teach a kid to buy his own $10 flu shot, vaccinate him for a lifetime.

Why not vaccinate for chickenpox? Helps reduce chance of scarring and reduces the chance for shingles.

There are conditions when vaccines **** children, but there is NO situation where the sensible choice is to not vaccinate your healthy child. The same with seatbelts.

People's networks encouraging them to not vaccinate their kids, or go on a "cleanse" or what-have-you.

So can anyone explain just why malaria was so hard to vaccinate against by existing methods in the first place?

On the other hand, there is a direct link between not being vaccinated and getting sick. Probably why they want to vaccinate against everything.

The law doesn't allow me to suggest you vaccinate the kids yourself, so I'll just leave this vaccination candy here &;&." OK, that one's definitely illegal, but interesting to contemplate.

Don't get me wrong -- I'm not certain I'm comfortable with the idea of forcing parents to vaccinate their children either. There are serious issues with personal autonomy there.

The stuff we vaccinate against is not harmless. I would also recommend Ben Goldacre's "bad science" where he makes one of the best analysis of the MMR scare insanity and its origins and development.

Failure to vaccinate your children against something like measles should be viewed as one notch down from child abuse. I'd also support eliminating all public welfare programs for people that refuse core vaccinations.

> Second-guessing their doctors and refusing to vaccinate their kids after reading stuff written by people who know exactly zip about medicine. This claim was originally by an expert doctor.

I have seen large groups of people who still refuse to vaccinate the newborns in their community. The ignorance and misinformation that is widespread even in the supposedly well educated stratas of society is just mind boggling.

The problem is, decades on 'vaccine victims' still quote Andrew Wakefields research paper as a reason to not vaccinate. Those are the 'vaccine victims' he was referring to and they are alive and well, working hard to bring back the iron lung hospital wards of the 1950s with their stupidity and ignorance.

Not all vaccinated children will be protected. Herd immunity keeps even those people safe. When people do not vaccinate they destroy herd immunity, meaning that unvaccinated and vaccinated but vulnerable children are at risk.

You'll vaccinate your kid to protect others as well, but if his lever doesn't stand it and became diabethic, you'll have a hard time finding schools that will provide assistance towards kids with special needs. If a vaccine has a 1% chance of going awry, commiting to do what it takes to support the 1% "unlucky" ones would help a lot lowering the resistance toward vaccines.

Notice how you have to vaccinate every year for it? But not for anything else? Yeah, it's because it's constantly mutating and it's a moving target. We still haven't figured out how to nail that target. What's worse, you need to go to a doctor to get vaccinated ...

All other points aside for a moment: the government should force each and every parent to vaccinate their children. Herd immunity is a key factor in protecting most of the population from many awful diseases, and herd immunity is only effective if the vast majority are vaccinated.

The reason that people who don't vaccinate themselves put everyone at risk is because of the herd immunity. The vaccine isn't 100% effective, but a 99% effective vaccine will prevent the disease from spreading around enough that the 1% where it didn't take are still safe. The unvaccinated, however, still create an infection risk for the 1% who weren't vaccinated successfully.

It seems difficult to fight this directly -- prosecuting anti-vaccinators would be viewed by supporters as persecution, and might actually make them more reluctant to vaccinate. Publicizing deaths due to lack of vaccination can work, but that lags -- by the time enough of the population is unvaccinated for the disease to spread and **** babies, it's too late.

The worst thing about people refusing to vaccinate their children is the fact that they themselves probably had all the vaccines in their childhood and did not suffer any consequences. I support banning of unvaccinated children from kinder gardens and schools as I think it's unacceptable to compromise herd immunity because of selfish non-scientific beliefs that verge on ideology at this point.

It's not a good thing that these people don't vaccinate their kids and end up feeding them bleach or whatever instead, but one would be a lot better off trying to address the root causes of what makes them take an adversarial position against modern medical science, rather than wishing to paper over the symptoms with dictatorial fiats. Also, I don't see how this is a very good simulation. As its rules are laid out, if you don't want polio, simply get vaccinated. Doesn't a large part of herd immunity have to do with even immunized people being susceptible under repeated contact with infected people? Furthermore, it deviates from objectivity with an implicit value judgment that unvaccinated people either "cannot be vaccinated" or "are freeloaders", when it's really just individuals' utility functions.