unmasking

I'm unmasking myself as a curmudgeon, but my blood boils when I see python people trying to do this stuff.

I'd be a bit more convinced of this 'unmasking' if Shinichi hadn't been all over the news last week.

Judges insist on unmasking who the perpetrator was.

Does anybody else think unmasking the password field is a terrible idea?

This isn't really an unmasking, and the original article uses a question mark, which makes its headline sound less definitive than this.

Somebody needs to do a best practices for pseudoanon OpenPGP like being careful not to upload your key to a keyserver in the clear, unmasking yourself.

I get around this by masking text until I tap a button, and then waiting a random number of ticks before decrypting the value and progressively unmasking the text.

Breaking that convention invites people typing passwords into the wrong field by mistake, which creates a greater security problem than unmasking passwords would solve.

Reentrancy of everything called inside a signal handler, interrupted system calls to handle, complexity in masking/unmasking, reinstalling of signal handler, and so forth.

Well, I guess that depends on whether or not people are going to pay 20k bitcoins into the supposed Bitcoin account of the purported unmasker, doesn't it?Is unmasking this person really worth what basically amounts to $100k USD?

For one that is going to a court to subpoena records from Yelp it is, I wasn't proposing a way to stop fake reviews, just to meet between releasing data and unmasking people's names who may have written legitimate reviews.