undeveloped

I thought the Stanford/Sandhill area surrounding 280 was undeveloped because the land is owned by Stanford.

We can provide hunter/gatherer levels of subsistence for anyone who wants it in some roped off, undeveloped land.

China would qualify if they didn't annex Tibet and didn't leave the whole western side of their country largely undeveloped.

Seattle has a huge city limits, but much of it is undeveloped parkland or somewhat industrial.

They may not know it but that singular decision effectively botched their chances of gaining high market shares in undeveloped markets.

Alternatively, look at a cheap toy produced in a shitty factory in an undeveloped country.

We can have a look at USA with probably the most expensive internet / mobile plans and worst internet (excluding undeveloped countries).

I think its a very undeveloped for market and I am excited to see MS continue to support it.

The parent's argument rests entirely on a vague claim that seems very undeveloped.

And prosperous, first-world nations do tremendous charity work, feeding the hungry, helping the sick, and helping the poor in undeveloped nations.

Its also around 100 miles less than the LA to SF route, through mostly undeveloped desert, so it could be a lot cheaper to build.

Because they are not unborn humans, they are undeveloped fetuses.

It's more like "hey we can pass a tax levy and take some money from each citizen to build a Cadillac internet service with no concern for profit or cost." It's thinking like this that had my town buying acres of land for a "tech park" that has sat undeveloped for years, and working plans for a waste materials separation facility that no private waste hauler will build because it's a guaranteed money-loser.