tlas

Recall that US TLAs have been pushing for this since strong encryption became widely available in the 80s.

When the chips are down, the NSA and other TLAs are going to get what they want.

Multinationals that give preference to one nation's TLAs have no right to complain when they're penalized for being preferential.

Sounds like fear mongering by the TLAs with the aim to discredit anonymity within the network rather than actual malice.

Then law enforcement and the TLAs might actually have to do real, actual investigative work.

Obviously, given that the TLAs can just national-security-letter a CA (if that's even necessary).

The phone system is a utility, and it's certainly not the fact that it's taxable that makes the TLAs interested in wiretapping it.

Out of my mind, this should take care of your wife tracking you to kill you, IF she doesn't work for governmentals TLAs.

Actually, it might be easier to simply treat them (NSA and Google) as the same entity, given that Google was created by the TLAs[1].

Using TLAs without defining them should be a bannable offense.

It can handle ADC, PWM, and probably a few other TLAs that I'm missing.

And then I'd still be concerned that there are 10 exploits that TLAs could use against me, that they keep under tight wraps.

Just more pork for the defense companies and "IC" TLAs, is what I say it is.