thermals

It would require powerful and big thermals compared to what a glider needs, but such conditions do exist.

Now finally with the Haswell chips they took a step back and tried to improve battery and thermals.

And i don't think these kinds of aircrafts have the wing surface etc to be floating around on thermals.

In general, thermals tend to be a significant issue for all form factors when devices are retrofitted.

With strong indoor thermals, it will be possible to take off inside and go through the roof.

Price, power and thermals will probably play a big part in how successful these parts will become.

Laptops that were built with thermals in mind actually do quite well at full load.

So maybe it can be a sort of follow-drone that flies in your general area, telling you where the thermals are.

But it's worse than FinFETs when you consider the control of the gate on the channel and when it comes to thermals.

I guess you could also simulate updrafts and downdrafts, maybe gliding on thermals like an eagle or vulture.

Then Intel went on a speed binge again and tried to yield the most bang for your buck, sacrificing thermals and battery life.

The current Silvermont/Bay Trail is twice as fast as the last, bringing C2D+ performance (eg 2010 MBA) with tablet thermals and battery life.

"areDefaultsSane = 0" should require user intervention to start after install and would be intended for things like insecure network daemons or daemons that control thermals/power/otherwiseImportantThings, whereas things that flagged "areDefaultsSane" as true would be started without intervention, this being intended for things like pulse.

Thermals aren't powerful enough to keep a non-glider aircraft in flight as far as I know.