theist

If you're a hardcore theist who thinks the devil is out to trick you: convincing arguments against belief.

Yes they are not Christian gods, so in that sense the person is still a-Christian-theist but does that still have meaning.

It is being a believer in some god (so, a theist ) as well as an anarchist.

It wasn't meant to convent a theist view point, if anything it nearly quotes Nietzsche about Man killing God.

There are plenty of atheists (or let's say non-theist) churches and organizations trying to emulate churches.

In absence of a theist point of view, no credible moral criticism of Mao is possible.

You can believe in a god (be a theist) and still think it's not provable that there is one (be an agnostic).

I would be better off as a militant atheist or familiar, friendly theist if I cared about internet points.

It's right there in the word: a-: lack of; -theist: one who believes in a deity.

The theist can opt to be a mere deist, and to say that the magnificence of the natural order strongly implies an ordering force.

I'm not a theist, but I also feel awe of the elusive concept of true randomness.

You don't have to be a theist to appreciate that.

But then I'm a theist who doesn't believe in fate, or "God knowing about something == God giving a care" or God giving a care what you had for dinner.

I do have difficulty following the reasoning of occidental monotheists though, who seem to try very hard to spin their definition of a single "God" in order to claim that atheists are just believers like any other theist.

>> with quite rational thoughts behind it: "I consider being gay among the greatest gifts God has given me." I'm not sure that would be both honest and rational, as the speaker should know that the Christian community will misunderstand their unqualified pantheist use of 'God' as a theist use of 'God'.

One can be an Agnostic Atheist or Agnostic Theist.