skepticism

That's where much of my skepticism comes from.

I was, at that point, aligned with the author in sharing his skepticism.

And all we have for him, after benefiting freely from the fruit of his labor, is skepticism.

He does it while pretending to be a neutral arbiter of fact, showing no skepticism at all about official claims.

This concept and forward thinking is of the type I make a conscious effort to protect from skepticism and naysayers.

But we also need an enormous amount of skepticism when evaluating it, just as we do when evaluating any large claim.

Yeah, I expressed skepticism that 300G/sec qualified as "largest ever" - I mean, I personally have been hit by 10G+ attacks, and Cogent mostly shrugged.

There is something wonderful about skepticism and cynicism being proven wrong, especially when the skepticism is my own.

I don't want to seem like I'm implying something here, so I will instead say overtly that I find the way you've singled out certain populations for skepticism with regards to whether they should be helped disturbing.

My skepticism comes simply from the fact that they/he have another fully funded project on Kickstarter, one that my teenage kid could probably --with some some help from dad-- execute on in a month, and they have not delivered yet.

These sorts of tendencies can be considered anti-authoritarian, but it is a reactionary anti-authoritarianism, not a healthy, well-reasoned skepticism of prevailing authorities.