sexting

What if that surveillance included inspecting all the sexting messages that teenagers send to each other over Snapchat?

Snapchat, after all, in many people's minds was about sexting and distasteful things - take the money.

But not because some cabal of Illuminati wanted to read sexting messages of every person on earth.

Streaking, being underage and sexting, having consensual relationships with someone slightly younger but under the age of consent, etc.

Evan, however, disagreed - Snapchat wasn't mostly used for sexting, it was used for sharing moments.

Arguments are, of course, less strong for convicting 16/17-year-olds of child porn for sexting, and even for removing images that were produced long ago.

Covering topics like porn, sexting, and predators isn't even a possibility.

Some teen sexting his teen girlfriend a picture of his dick?

I stop watching after they spent a week focusing on Brett Farve's sexting incident.

> But not because some cabal of Illuminati wanted to read sexting messages of every person on earth.

The whole sexting thing is a load of drivel concocted by the media because like any good story, it strikes fear into the heart of middle america.

We don't want to endanger ourselves in order to protect the banal communications on our cell phones or dissemble our legal system for the sake of keeping our sexting private.

He calls out the "sexting apps" directly, but most of the article is about him reconnecting with his friends at Google and the conclusion seems driven from that interaction.

The things he called out were "helping rich people find taxis more easily, selling ads more effectively, or building sexting apps".

Snapchat raised a couple million or so and I'm still not sure how a billion-dollar self-destruct sexting app can be monetized "that much".

It requires abusing a child (of course in the current landscape child porn is watered down to "whatever gives this politician a boner" - like teenagers sexting between them or works of fiction) But yeah...