sensorimotor

Basically the argument is that our visual imagination is grounded in sensorimotor systems that are optimised for three spatial dimensions.

We describe these connections, and then suggest the specific roles they play in the context of a heterarchy of sensorimotor regions.

Same sensorimotor neurons in the human speech apparatus have cognitive analogues, developed together over vast expanses of history.

Reading fiction increases brain connectivity, particularly in language areas and sensorimotor regions, with effects lasting beyond the reading session.

It means accessible to people with sensorimotor disabilities.

So the existence of a sensorimotor feedback loop for a basic behavior is innate (e.g.

They get trained on sensorimotor data humans will never be able to train on.

Apologies if I'm stepping on a joke, but just in case: Nativism is about cognitive capacities, not sensorimotor ones.

A lack of sensorimotor grounding limits what kinds of understanding the system can acquire; it does not eliminate all possible forms of understanding.

However, the brain has evolved to operate in a closed sensorimotor loop, so the brain's activity ought to influence subsequent perception (and brain state).

There's also the difficult task of real-world interaction (or as the article puts it, low-level sensorimotor skills), although I suppose this is what you mean by perceptual problems.

Is AI going to require ambulation to close the sensorimotor loop?

Besides, the distinction between "high-level reasoning" and "low-level sensorimotor skills" seems fairly weak.

"Mental content" seems way to broad for what is rather the sensorimotor part of speech.