rightful

They are mistreated and much of their rightful power is stolen from them, but not all of it.

Letting the children live would give you the problem of a vengeful (and rightful) heir in ~10 years' time.

And the notion that black lives, black bodies, and black wealth were rightful targets remained deeply rooted in the broader society.

They demonstrated a disturbing lack of empathy with the rightful outrage of the client.

Too often wikileaks is compared to the Snowden leaks, which triggered a rightful outrage.

Preforking webservers, like event-driven ones, still have a rightful place in this world.

And assume the rightful risk that is employing another human being.

It's no more or less important than our account of their history, but our version is certainly going to be met with some (rightful) skepticism.

When the rightful owner of a property decides that it's time.

Who really is the rightful owner is hard to say.

Guess who defines who the rightful owner of property is?

In common usage, theft is the taking of another person's property without that person's permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.

How would the rightful user ever get access to the service again that was secured by "email a link" if there is no additional secret necessary for logging in and authorizing changes to the user data?

Code § 117 which allows backup copies or computer programs "that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful".

The problem with the pure "email me a link" approach seems to be that breaking into an email account gets only more valuable: The rightful user can't do anything if an attacker gets access to his mail account (or even just his mails), logs into the service secured by "email me a link" and then changes the associated email address for that account.