rich

Consider this one: if taxes on the rich go up, job creation will go down.

"That's why I can say with confidence that rich people don't create jobs, nor do businesses large or small.

It's not about how rich you'll become, or how famous, or who will like you, or how much fun it will be.

In all honesty, in most cases the middle class and rich have good reason not to network with the poor.

He's the very, very rich guy who wants to drag down the entire tech industry to get even richer.

If it was true that lower taxes for the rich and more wealth for the wealthy led to job creation, today we would be drowning in jobs.

That's why taxing the rich to pay for investments that benefit all is such a fantastic deal for the middle class and the rich.

Unfortunately, as the article mentions the rich in India - to a great extent - are failing at this.

Tzvetkoff instantly became one of Australia's richest young men - purchasing a $25M home etc. etc.

Lawyers don't get rich for knowing the law, bankers don't get rich for understanding economics and programmers don't get rich for slinging code.

When the biggest tax exemptions, and lowest tax rates, benefit the richest, all in the name of job creation, all that happens is that the rich get richer.

If you were any good at the oil business at all, he would also offer you a job, which again would have eventually made you very very rich.

I would love to hire people like you... people who are willing to take a paycut and small stock grants in order to fulfill my grand mission: to make myself as rich as possible.

"Another reason that this idea is so wrong-headed is that there can never be enough super-rich people to power a great economy.

If Oculus had been able to give away just 10% equity, every single Kickstarter backer would be $20,000 richer today.

Maybe they feel that they are still struggling to survive and therefore can't spare a moment for someone else ?The rich do need to take a moment to feel rich and then feel responsible.

Likewise, a policymaker who believes that the rich are job creators and therefore should not be taxed, will do equally terrible policy.

Chemical symbols are just one of many plugins for their core software which interprets unstructured, information rich data like raster diagrams.

Companies exist to make management, investors and founders rich - they hold the vast majority of the stock - and benefit greatly from path dependence and network effects.

In India we say that if you have two meals a day, and a roof over your head, you're already rich!Consider that, some posts here say that SV millionaires do not consider themselves upper class.

Google has enabled its own Android phones to access YouTube so that users can search for video categories, find favorites, see ratings, and so forth in the rich user interfaces offered by those phones.

I can now bounce around CEO and President positions for a while...spending a year or two at each place, strike enough good compensation deals to make me rich and eventually buy myself into a few choice board positions.

Supply-side economics and increased benefits for the rich are a major part of the Republican platform, and because this idea has been accepted as true by society at large, it is not being directly challenged by the Democrats.

So, ladies and gentlemen, here's an idea worth spreading: in a capitalist economy, the true job creators are middle-class consumers, and taxing the rich to make investments to make the middle class grow and thrive is the single shrewdest thing we can do for the middle class, for the poor, and for the rich.