rerum

It tells the story of the rediscovery of Lucretius's poem De rerum natura (On the Nature of Things), which was assumed lost.

A few interesting excerpts from Rerum Novarum in the context of current society.

The encyclical he references, Rerum Novarum, can be found here [0] and is much more interesting since it's more than just a single sentence.

On the Nature of Things (De rerum natura) by Lucretius is a fascinating glimpse at the foundation of scientific thought from the 1st century BC.

Architecture in ancient cities was subject to nature in rerum natura.

I simply factually suggested that it could be of interest to (re-)read the Rerum Novarum.

I think the most interesting thing is that he has specially mentioned Rerum Novarum as a reason for choosing the name Leo.

Having re-read Rerum Novarum within the last week, what you are saying is reductive to the point of not accurately portraying the contents of the encyclical.

I don't think Opus Dei spends a lot of time discussing Rerum Novarum, honestly.

( De Rerum Natura is a Roman philosophical poem from the mid-first century BCE.

I arguably expanded the world's knowledge of De Rerum Natura.

Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.

Thus, one way or another it must be accepted, it must be seen as an inevitable part of the "rerum naturum".

On the contrary, at the time Rerum Novarum was written, "socialism" was not understood narrowly as "whatever Soviets did".

Furthermore, Leo states that the working man has, "has interests in which he should be protected by the State," namely their spiritual and physical well-being (Rerum novarum 40).

Works like "De Rerum Naturae" (Greenblatt's subject) were scientifically significant so there is a bit of overlap between this loss of humanistic, bibliographic learning and scientific and technological achievement.

Rerum Novarum is a good one to start with.